govern archives.htm

GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES

ARCHIVES

HOME PAGE


                                                                                                                                      Photo By Nicola

1. ALL IS FAIR IN LOVE AND WAR
2. REAGAN AND HIS CRITICS
3. JOHNNY WALKER: TRAITOR
4. AFGHANISTAN SIEVE 02-11-02
5. AFGHANISTAN SIEVE 03-03-02
6. DO N0T BUY (Made in China) 03-10-02
7. ISOLATION FROM BIGOTRY 03-17-02
8. China (DO NOT BUY) Revisited (2005)
9.
10.

1.

All Is Fair In Love and War

          "All is Fair in Love and War!" It is a famous quote by someone. I will not comment on 'Love,' but we know it holds true in war. Intelligence creates strategy for the military the world over, and is critical in winning any war. Sun Tsu's, "Art of War," has been read by countless people since it was first published in 1910, and has been on the book lists ever since that time. It is the quintessential strategy of war that is followed by our enemies, that elicits no outcry. I believe that our military understands this strategy, as Sun Tsu wrote, but are hamstrung by interference from our people, politicians, press, and all the humanitarian organizations that we have forced upon our armies all over the world and we are losing our wars. Remember Vietnam.

     Sun Tsu wrote:
     "He whose generals are able and not interfered with by the sovereign (our Commander in Chief )) will be victorious.
     Tu Yu:&ldots;Therefore Master Wang said: To make appointments is the province of the sovereign; to decide on battle, that of the general."
     The first priority in a war is for Bush, our Commander in Chief, is to be of the intelligence to make the judgment to choose an experienced general of practical decisive military strategy and leadership. The sovereign then assigns the general what his sole responsibility is, to be victorious. That is the responsibility a Commander in Chief has to his country. Defeat or victory is always in the hands of the sovereign if he leaves the affairs of the military to decide for themselves. The Commander in Chief, assigned by public vote, never has to explain the assigning or firing a general, because it is done in his country's best interest.

1)   Sun Tsu wrote: "Now there are three ways in which a RULER can bring misfortune upon his army:
When ignorant that the army should not advance, to order an advance or ignorant that it should not retire, to order a retirement. This is described as "hobbling the army."
     Chia Lin: The advance and retirement of the army can be controlled by the general in accordance with prevailing circumstances. No evil is greater than commands of the sovereign from the court."
      Our Commander in Chief allows every private and government agency to dictate and micromanage our military deployments and strategy fueled by people who hate the Commander in Chief, such as news reporters, analysts, retired military personnel, and academics who have no idea how to conduct a war, and with no direct experience. The arm chair strategists abound all over the media primarily to influence the people's polling, vote, and their ideology; all at the expense of our people's sons and daughter in the military. We are hobbling our army, losing lives and the war.

2) Sun Tsu, "When ignorant of military affairs, to participate in their administration. This causes the officers to be perplexed.
      Ts'ao Ts'ao: &ldots; An army cannot be run according to rules of etiquette.
      Tu Mu: As far as proprietary laws and decrees are concerned, the army has its own code, which it ordinarily follows. If these are made identical with those used in governing a state the officers will be bewildered.
      Know the enemy and know yourself; in a hundred battles you will never be in peril."
      Our enemies, and it is well documented, do not respect the Geneva Convention's principles of war. When they ignore a principle then they lose the protection of such principles, and we must fight fire with fire, i.e. we have the right in such a moral issue and are morally bound, to reciprocate in kind. See "Morals," in the book, "The Philosophy of Morals & Values," by Nicola.
      The recent flap over the behavior of an intelligence gathering operation in an Iraq prison of questionable prisoners is a valid military operation. We are in a war and to save our men and women from being killed daily (over 1,000) and the generals have the right and are just in taking any means to reverse the enemy's successes in their terrorist actions. If we do not trust our military we are sure to be defeated because the non-military are sacrificing our soldiers for supervisor's ill held beliefs and lack of courage.
     To know the enemy is to gather intelligence about him from him, there is no other way and our enemies have been doing the same. A prisoner suffers horribly on the battlefield to live and that expectation as a prisoner of war is the same. The general determines by intelligence where the enemy is weak, therefore, where, how and the needs to deploy with the least casualties upon his army. To underestimate in men, cost, and actions one needs to take, spells defeat. Give the army what it needs and the freedom to do what it has to do to get the job done, or suffer defeat. If they lose the war then we can place the entire blame on the Commander in Chief for his choice of a general.

3)   Sun Tsu, "When ignorant of command problems to share in the exercise of responsibilities. This engenders doubts in the minds of the officers.
       Wang His:   If one is ignorant of military matters is sent to participate in the administration of the army, then in every movement there will be disagreement and mutual frustration and the entire army will be hamstrung. That is why Pei Tu in 815 A.D. requested the throne to withdraw the army supervisor; only then was he able to pacify Ts'ao Chou.
     Chang Yü: In recent times court officials have been used as supervisors of the army and this is precisely what is wrong.
     Chang Yu: Benevolence and righteousness may be used to govern a state, but cannot be used to administer an army. Expediency and flexibility are used in administering an army, but cannot be used in governing a state."
     Take command of the battle zone.
     Start by dismissing from the battlefield the supervisors that includes all the press and photographers, humanitarian organizations, and all private contractors. Keep them away from military bases, camps, and in the fields of actions. Learn to whisk away captured possible intelligence sources to your intelligence department that is manned and guarded only by intelligence personnel some where not in the country's battle zone, but preferably in the army's nation under extremely tight security entirely manned always by the intelligence agency assigned. Leave the armies alone to do their job.

   Sun Tsu: "The enemy will not apologize for his deeds." Our enemies have no compunction over whatever collateral damage or cruelty he shows us on TV; there is no outrage from anyone. Our adversaries receive our sympathy and are not criticized nor are they shamed in the press as we have so unfairly experienced. Neither should we show restraint or be apologetic; to do so is to self sacrifice, to surrender to the enemy's will. Our Military is doing everything possible, but is hamstrung with pressmen and photographers looking over their shoulders, a deluge of civilian envoys, humanitarian inspectors, and politicians along with the news media at home dying for a gory story to critique and blow up all out of proportion to the original deed. It is all for political or personal gain at the expense of the public that has to supply their loved ones to fight a necessary war, and that is a horror. A majority of people have completely forgot, 9-11, in a disgusting show of self sacrifice. As a result, right now, no one is in charge, and we are losing!

     Why are we not reporting in Iraq over their radio and TV our side of the conflict. It is far more important to be teaching them the responsibilities of free enterprise; what is a constitution; how they should cast a moral vote for leaders and those things they will be responsible for in a free society? Why are we not privatizing their relatively giant oil fields, utilities etc. companies and issuing an equally divided stock to every family in Iraq. Get them interested in what freedom is all about. Teach freedom, self responsibility, or that the company that is taxed less will provide more jobs with benefits, and that they should not bite the hand that will feed them; free enterprise, in their schools and homes. Where is our propaganda machine or supervisors, who should be teaching Iraq about the freedom that is being handed to them at a cost in American lives.
     If we do not want to do these things, then let us bring our army home and let them guard our borders to defend us from aliens who cross our borders and is destroying our economy. Then leave them alone to do their job. War can never be sanitized; it is a dirty job and let the army do what they do best for us. And last, get out of the UN (every member is either is a totalitarian theocratic or socialist state) then chase them out of the U.S.A., and take care of ourselves as we did quite well before the turn of twentieth century when we went global, and have been at war ever since. This is insane! It is time we let them fight their own battles and being neutral we will have no enemies, then we can sell them all the new and used armaments for big profits that will create more jobs for our economy!
      Perhaps the most moral humane thing to do today is for a commander in the mititary to instruct his troops that in order to win this battle is to first shoot those who will report back on their actions, then victory may be assured and their lives saved. Isn't that fair?
Copyright.- Reprint by Permission
Nicola
Home Page 6-1-04  to 5-15-05

PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEB SITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, At, www. Philo-Psy.org" IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE

2. Reagan and His Critics
By Sean Hannity
FOX News / Author, Deliver Us from Evil: Defeating Terrorism,
Despotism, and Liberalism
The following excerpt is from a speech delivered on February 24, 2004 at a Hilsdale College National Leadership Seminar in Naples, Florida.

       When Ronald Reagan ran for president, he had the gall (from a liberal standpoint) to proclaim the goal of defeating the Soviet Union in the Cold War. And looking back at the arguments and complaints from Reagan's critics at the time, they sound eerily familiar. When Reagan started building up the military, his critics warned it would make things worse by provoking the Soviets. When he deployed missiles in West Germany, his critics adopted the disarmament position of left wing European parties and decried American "unilateralism." When he called the Soviet Union an "evil empire," his critics were beside themselves with embarrassment at having a president who thought in terms of good and evil, black and white, rather than in "nuanced" shades of gray.
      Reagan taught us that peace can only be achieved from a position of strength. He also insisted on pursuing a way to defend the American people against ballistic missiles, rejecting the previous policy (and still the preferred policy of liberals) of remaining defenseless so that our enemies will not feel threatened. That drove the Soviet Union nuts. At the Reykjavik Summit in 1986, Mikhail Gorbachev offered a reduction in Soviet missiles in exchange for a cancellation of Reagan's missile defense project. Reagan said no and walked away - again inviting the scorn and derision of the American and European liberals. Undaunted, he went to Berlin and demanded that Gorbachev tear down the wall that divided that city.
      And what happened then? The Soviet Union crumbled and the world became a safer and better and freer place. There are valuable lessons for us today in this history of the last years of the Cold War. //\\
      This Article: "Reprinted by permission from Imprimis, the national speech digest of Hillsdale College, www.hillsdale.edu "

       It is with deep regret that we here at Philo-Psy learned that Ronald Reagan passed away Saturday, June 5, 2004, "May He Rest in Peace."
      Bush is hanging tough in the war on terrorism even though his ratings are low and so was Reagan's polls, so it seems people love a tough president. We ask, are those ratings that are taken by or for the liberal press, seems kind of phony don't you think???? Do the republicans have polltakers too???? You can Bet on it!
      We should note that the U.N. then and today is irrelevant, a waste of time with very little productivity and is a waste of tax money that just helps to increases poverty around the world and should be abandoned

PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEB SITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, At, www. Philo-Psy.org" IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE

PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEB SITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, At, www. Philo-Psy.org" IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE

3. PHILO-PSY'S COMMENT FOR THE WEEK
01-28-02 --- 02-03-02
Johnny Walker: Traitor
     Treason is the offense of acting to overthrow one's government, to harm or kill its sovereign, or its political leaders, citizens, and its armed forces. It is a betrayal of a trust or confidence, a breach of honor, and considered as disloyalty and treachery towards one's country. It is giving up one's citizenship no longer respecting the country's laws and choosing the laws to live by of a foreign country. We should respect his wish and treat him as he wishes his new country would try such behavior he has displayed towards us.
     John Walker, a U.S. citizen because of his sympathy for the Taliban, embraces its religion after academic, military, and terrorist training is caught while in a military action against a country of which he is a citizen, is a traitor. Johnny boy was not just emotionally caught up in strange circumstances, but his was a studied reasoned decision with many opportunities to recant his commitment, and go home. His motivation may have been for recognition as an American amongst them, or to be with those who hated and vilified our country. But his motivation may not be subject to analysis, only his actions give the best evidence of his intent, and that was his militancy to assist in destroying his fellow citizens. He was engaged in killing us and to believe something else is naive. He fits the traitor model like a glove. In a real war he would be court marshaled and shot. It is obvious we are in a phony war against terrorism because in the final analysis we are, un-militarily, just turning the other cheek.
     The fallout in this fiasco will be visited upon the present administrations for decades, where we find the similarities, of traitors. To forgive is to commit suicide.
Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization

       ANY NEW PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY NEWS SERVICES, OR SYNDICATES, OR WEB SITES PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization" OR, "nicola, AT: www.philo-psy.org"   IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE.

4. PHILO-PSY'S COMMENT FOR THE WEEK
02-04-02--- 02-11-02
AFGHANISTAN SIEVE

     Army general Tommy Franks commander of the forces in Afghanistan has defended his military strategy with the excuses that it was good tactics to support Afghan anti-Taliban forces with massive air power and a few special forces on the ground. In many cases there were no allied forces. He puts forth the weakest defense when he states that he did not want to repeat the 1979 Russian mistakes that caused much Afghan resentment. Afghanistan soon understood our intentions we were not Russian conquerors to make them part of the United States but after one man and to destroy his terrorist training operation and his world-wide organization. Nine - Eleven, they understood, was to be avenged.

      For the most part of this air and thin ground support war in a country the size of Texas which has failed, we created the Afghan sieve, where any one could slip over any border, anywhere, day or night. We did not have sufficient army support to guard known crossings let alone the rest of the border. It was common knowledge on the ground there, which our intelligence capability seems to have been completely oblivious to, that any one with a little money could get into any of the neighboring countries.

     Let us forgive all that as poor strategy and ask the question most of the arm chair strategists would like to ask, 'What the hell happened at Tora Bora?'   Here was the crucial place where the military felt they may have had bin Laden trapped. Tora Bora an entry way close to the Pakistan border and our military sends no one to the border. Strategy dictates they should now use a great force on the ground at the border in Afghanistan say ten or twenty thousand with helicopter and air support to trap the al Qaeda. Instead, we gave the responsibility to the Pakistan army on their border, which is not Asia's finest, and of which many are sympathetic to the Taliban cause. Asians resent our presence, resent they have to take our help or money and will never give us the time of day. The warlords in their fiefdoms or kingdoms will continue their warfare with one another after we leave. We do not have good military strategy and will never succeed in our battle against terrorism, unless - see next week's comments.      Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization

PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEBSITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization" at: www.philo-psy.org"   IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE.

5. PHILO-PSY'S COMMENT FOR THE WEEK
02-25-02 ---- 03-03-02
AFGHANISTAN SIEVE
      The united front in Afghanistan is a group of fiefdoms or mini kingdoms that have absolute power over their followers. It is their religion tied to their culture and economy, where to go against their ruler is to go against their god, Allah. They have had totalitarian control of their people's economy, property rights, and cultural behavior for so long, that their power is, today, unquestioned by the shaky coalition we have with our 'allies.' The war'lords' dictate what is grown, what businesses will operate, and the behavior towards their ruler must be reverent and obedient of the his law, if he wants veiled women, that's what he gets. No two fiefdoms can ever agree, because such unions will inevitably be reduced to only having one ruler and such power is not given up easily. The CIA, in a Feb. 21, 2002, story warns us of such chaos and the press is quick to hide their head in the sand, calling it 'ethnic' tensions, when it is obvious to the illiterate people in Afghanistan, and in this country it is entirely religiously motivated.
      We will try to control this religious tendency towards separate conclaves with the infusion of money that they can divide fairly among themselves and be peaceable towards a central government until foreign money runs out. It is like a sieve, money will just run through their hands and the citizen will not see a dollar. When there is no money left, rulers will pay no attention to the ruling factions in their capital, Kabul, which may inevitably lead to war amongst them selves. This is the reason there is a call for the UN to intervene and keep them from fighting. The UN will have to support the regime in Kabul and it will earn the hatred of the Afghan people. Our government announced this week that the U. S. A. will send our soldiers to keep the peace so that now we will be the hated ones.
      No state has the right to rule over the socioeconomic society of its citizens who can create their own society for themselves. The character of a moral government requires that they protect the freedom of its people to be responsible for themselves. This is called a Promotean type of government. Those who rule now will never bring such a government about for its people, but, it is the citizen who must have the courage and decency for his children's sake, to take this cause upon himself. All the soldiers in the world cannot do that for them. The whole political world is a sieve where all of our money goes right through their hands, and where, nobody knows. That's why our strategy militarily, and politically, cannot succeed in Afghanistan or any where else on earth because eventually we all give up our power to either the theocrats or socialist totalitarian rulers. We have been free too long and know not what freedom means except that we will give it up to feel safe.
Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization

PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEBSITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization" OR, "nicola, at: www.philo-psy.org"   IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE.

6. PHILO-PSY'S COMMENT FOR THE WEEK
03-04-02 ---- 03-10-02
DO N0T BUY (Made in China)

      President Bush, on his China trek, spoke about America explaining to its people about our culture. Our president, and 'What's-his-name, Ding Dong,' the head of a failed socialistic country that is now trying to create a Fascist socioeconomic regime such as ours. Behind closed doors, they came to an understanding on issues. This we are not too clear about, except that they agreed to disagree on religious and socialistic cultural ideals. 'Ding Dong,' does not like a middle man to siphon off church money, hence his state run churches. For churches to be associated with any foreign or structured authority within the country, is clearly out of the control of the state, and as such prone to raise public opinion to separate church and state, resulting in no money for the state - a Ding Dong with no bell. No money for the state, then no church, it is that simple and anything that smacks of individualism, is out of the question for the China leader.
     In a totalitarian regime it is control, control, control. Control of the citizen's mind, control of his physical being, and all that to control his wealth, its about money. That is how this world works. It is where the citizen is expected to bend to their will, and not speak out. Nor are they able to identify the state's motivation, and they are lazy or afraid to take any action - sounds like us.
    Bush spoke about our culture, how good we are and how we love everyone, even Chinese people when they are so different from us. That's OK, but that was treating them like children, what he should be telling them is how a free country's economy works. How we have property rights (which we all have but lost), and the responsibilities of a free people (that the state is assuming). Also, we cannot say these things because we would have to tell them that they are working because we buy from china whose cheap labor is costing us jobs in our country.
   Our president would have to tell them that we are propping up their failed communistic socialistic immoral system. Then it may become evident that socialism, Fascism, and theocracies cannot sustain an economy because they are morally bankrupt. If their system is so good why can't they bury us economically? They need our investments, which can only come from profits from a capitalistic society, which in this case, is taking jobs from United States citizens!
     Our greatest mistake is to allow the greatest loss of jobs in history to China.   We should not be saving their corrupt immoral government, to create an even greater poor class in our own country, for Chinese people who will not even fight for their own freedom. They didn't come out in force against their government but let their children die in Tienamen Square and hid, with not even a whimper. They thank their government when one of their jailed children is let out of prison.
    We are prolonging their slavery for some undefined future. If you don't buy from China you will be doing those children a favor. Once Ding Dong and his cohorts have all the business in place they plan for, they will find reason to seize and nationalize their economy.
     We are buying time for them to arm themselves. Your moral action is to protest and look under that cheap item and don't buy anything that is (Made in China). Do you know what moral principle you will be following with that mental act?   And, remember also, that freedom does not come cheap, but costs nothing to lose.
Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization

PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEBSITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization" OR, "nicola, at: www.philo-psy.org"   IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE.

7. PHILO-PSY'S COMMENT OF THE WEEK
03-11-02 --- 03-17-02
ISOLATION FROM BIGOTRY

      Syria and the Saudi's have agreed to end Middle East violence in return for all land it won in the 1967 war. The Arab League is critical of their agreement since that body requires a consensus. The Palestinian's Hamas only wants the destruction of the Jewish state. Only Syria would be happy to get back their most treasured vantage point, the Golan Heights, to make them stronger in another religious/socialist conflict against Israel.
      Egypt's Leader Mubarak is pushing Bush to force both parties Sharon and Arafat to sit down and negotiate a peace, which he would host in Egypt. He seems to want to be the power broker, and if he wants to, let him. The Egyptian, Palestinian, and the Israeli can take care of themselves over there. It is our cue to exit this religious bigotry, and get out of the Middle East and only attack those who threaten to terrorize the U.S.A..
       We supported leaders like Savimbi in Angola, and we should stay out of Africa. We supported NATO in the Balkans and we should get out of there (NATO & Balkans), and let them fight their own wars. And while we are at it get out of China, for a safer cold war, then we can drown the United Nations in the East River. The rest of the world has gone crazy, so let's not do the same.
       Let us enjoy our home as we all do, in isolation, which is the proper terminology for a country created for natural individualism. Of course we will have to keep a big gun in the house, as long as we have religious fanatics running around who may start WWIII. And when they do we should just bomb them from here, to stay home and take care of ourselves.
Nicola

PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEBSITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization" OR, "nicola, at: www.philo-psy.org"   IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE.

8. China's Strategy Revisited (2005)
Do Not Buy, "MADE IN CHINA"

     If you are following our home page comments, one of our past articles was titled, "Do Not Buy 'Made In China.' You may request a copy, give us 48 hours to e-mail it to you and it is to be for your use only. Well, as predicted in the essay, with our investing in their slave economy and buying from China would only strengthen their hold on their people, build up their war machine, threaten their neighbors, and in the near future, nationalize our investments.

     Since the beginning of our trade with China in the 1970s as a result of Nixon's permitting United States' capital and jobs to flow into a failed totalitarian socialist country that has built up their military, nuclear and missile war machine. Trade has not made them a peace loving regime but an embolden enemy of freedom. China, as a socialist state, was failing to create a socialist utopia, broke, living in abject poverty and was no threat.

      China welcomed Nixon's diplomatic move to suggest that a Fascist state would benefit their government while still maintaining dictatorial control. Their actions and ours since that time prove that strategy is working. They would use capitalism under oppressive state control and maintain control of their cultural dictatorship as well. United States diplomacy took a fatal direction a free country should know better not to take, and our economy is suffering for it today with the threat of capital loss and experiencing enormous job losses. Add 11,000,000 illeagal Mexican workers and the dilution of our China strained labor pool is dealing us an economic blow. How can anyone say to the poor, "You should get a job!"

     The Taiwan island nation is organizing for a referendum by Taiwan president, Chen Shi-bian, for March 20, 2004, for their 23 million people to gain their independence. They have worked hard and smart since the late 1940s to create a great capitalist economy, in freedom. The Taiwanese have a moral right to declare themselves free, as a people not unlike our own struggle for freedom. China's claim that Taiwan belongs to them is not true in moral justice. China will not be appeased, if we give them Taiwan and we the immoral nation we have become, will.

     Some of our own states have had referendums to secede without any interference from our national government. China's government in principle morally does not own land or the people within. All people have the right of choice, and the first is in who will govern them. Taiwan's referendum is their declaration and right of independence that especially we, should honor and do all we can to defend their wishes.

      "China's Zhang Mingqing, deputy director and spokesman for China's Taiwan Affairs Office, dramatized the relentless opposition to the referendum being organized....It was the latest in a crescendo of warnings that the referendum could provoke a strong Chinese reaction, with a military response the unspoken but clearly understood danger."

     If we watch the actions of China and our government what we predicted may become a frightening reality. Should the United States want to temporarily protect their investments, they may take actions behind diplomatic doors to convince Taiwan's leaders to put off their referendum. If we do that, instead of strongly telling China to leave the people of Taiwan to govern themselves, then we will be protecting China's long range goals to become a world threat.

    You know China's goals for world socialist domination, if you are a realist. We have no moral strategy for freedom. Nixon's and Kissinger's poor strategy has not worked in over thirty years with nothing but a grand failure in diplomacy and it is wrecking our culture and economy.

     Before you buy anything, turn it over to see where it is made. If it is "Made in China," do not buy it and save someone's job.
Nicola   (2005)

COPYRIGHT© 2007 'Philo-Psy' (1148 N. Goodman Street, Rochester, NY 14609)
(585) 338-1532. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

	PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEB SITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, At, www. Philo-Psy.org" IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE
	3. PHILO-PSY'S COMMENT FOR THE WEEK 01-28-02 --- 02-03-02 Johnny Walker: Traitor Treason is the offense of acting to overthrow one's government, to harm or kill its sovereign, or its political leaders, citizens, and its armed forces. It is a betrayal of a trust or confidence, a breach of honor, and considered as disloyalty and treachery towards one's country. It is giving up one's citizenship no longer respecting the country's laws and choosing the laws to live by of a foreign country. We should respect his wish and treat him as he wishes his new country would try such behavior he has displayed towards us. John Walker, a U.S. citizen because of his sympathy for the Taliban, embraces its religion after academic, military, and terrorist training is caught while in a military action against a country of which he is a citizen, is a traitor. Johnny boy was not just emotionally caught up in strange circumstances, but his was a studied reasoned decision with many opportunities to recant his commitment, and go home. His motivation may have been for recognition as an American amongst them, or to be with those who hated and vilified our country. But his motivation may not be subject to analysis, only his actions give the best evidence of his intent, and that was his militancy to assist in destroying his fellow citizens. He was engaged in killing us and to believe something else is naive. He fits the traitor model like a glove. In a real war he would be court marshaled and shot. It is obvious we are in a phony war against terrorism because in the final analysis we are, un-militarily, just turning the other cheek. The fallout in this fiasco will be visited upon the present administrations for decades, where we find the similarities, of traitors. To forgive is to commit suicide. Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization ANY NEW PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY NEWS SERVICES, OR SYNDICATES, OR WEB SITES PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization" OR, "nicola, AT: www.philo-psy.org" IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE.
	4. PHILO-PSY'S COMMENT FOR THE WEEK 02-04-02--- 02-11-02 AFGHANISTAN SIEVE Army general Tommy Franks commander of the forces in Afghanistan has defended his military strategy with the excuses that it was good tactics to support Afghan anti-Taliban forces with massive air power and a few special forces on the ground. In many cases there were no allied forces. He puts forth the weakest defense when he states that he did not want to repeat the 1979 Russian mistakes that caused much Afghan resentment. Afghanistan soon understood our intentions we were not Russian conquerors to make them part of the United States but after one man and to destroy his terrorist training operation and his world-wide organization. Nine - Eleven, they understood, was to be avenged. For the most part of this air and thin ground support war in a country the size of Texas which has failed, we created the Afghan sieve, where any one could slip over any border, anywhere, day or night. We did not have sufficient army support to guard known crossings let alone the rest of the border. It was common knowledge on the ground there, which our intelligence capability seems to have been completely oblivious to, that any one with a little money could get into any of the neighboring countries. Let us forgive all that as poor strategy and ask the question most of the arm chair strategists would like to ask, 'What the hell happened at Tora Bora?' Here was the crucial place where the military felt they may have had bin Laden trapped. Tora Bora an entry way close to the Pakistan border and our military sends no one to the border. Strategy dictates they should now use a great force on the ground at the border in Afghanistan say ten or twenty thousand with helicopter and air support to trap the al Qaeda. Instead, we gave the responsibility to the Pakistan army on their border, which is not Asia's finest, and of which many are sympathetic to the Taliban cause. Asians resent our presence, resent they have to take our help or money and will never give us the time of day. The warlords in their fiefdoms or kingdoms will continue their warfare with one another after we leave. We do not have good military strategy and will never succeed in our battle against terrorism, unless - see next week's comments. Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEBSITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization" at: www.philo-psy.org" IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE.
	5. PHILO-PSY'S COMMENT FOR THE WEEK 02-25-02 ---- 03-03-02 AFGHANISTAN SIEVE The united front in Afghanistan is a group of fiefdoms or mini kingdoms that have absolute power over their followers. It is their religion tied to their culture and economy, where to go against their ruler is to go against their god, Allah. They have had totalitarian control of their people's economy, property rights, and cultural behavior for so long, that their power is, today, unquestioned by the shaky coalition we have with our 'allies.' The war'lords' dictate what is grown, what businesses will operate, and the behavior towards their ruler must be reverent and obedient of the his law, if he wants veiled women, that's what he gets. No two fiefdoms can ever agree, because such unions will inevitably be reduced to only having one ruler and such power is not given up easily. The CIA, in a Feb. 21, 2002, story warns us of such chaos and the press is quick to hide their head in the sand, calling it 'ethnic' tensions, when it is obvious to the illiterate people in Afghanistan, and in this country it is entirely religiously motivated. We will try to control this religious tendency towards separate conclaves with the infusion of money that they can divide fairly among themselves and be peaceable towards a central government until foreign money runs out. It is like a sieve, money will just run through their hands and the citizen will not see a dollar. When there is no money left, rulers will pay no attention to the ruling factions in their capital, Kabul, which may inevitably lead to war amongst them selves. This is the reason there is a call for the UN to intervene and keep them from fighting. The UN will have to support the regime in Kabul and it will earn the hatred of the Afghan people. Our government announced this week that the U. S. A. will send our soldiers to keep the peace so that now we will be the hated ones. No state has the right to rule over the socioeconomic society of its citizens who can create their own society for themselves. The character of a moral government requires that they protect the freedom of its people to be responsible for themselves. This is called a Promotean type of government. Those who rule now will never bring such a government about for its people, but, it is the citizen who must have the courage and decency for his children's sake, to take this cause upon himself. All the soldiers in the world cannot do that for them. The whole political world is a sieve where all of our money goes right through their hands, and where, nobody knows. That's why our strategy militarily, and politically, cannot succeed in Afghanistan or any where else on earth because eventually we all give up our power to either the theocrats or socialist totalitarian rulers. We have been free too long and know not what freedom means except that we will give it up to feel safe. Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEBSITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization" OR, "nicola, at: www.philo-psy.org" IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE.
	6. PHILO-PSY'S COMMENT FOR THE WEEK 03-04-02 ---- 03-10-02 DO N0T BUY (Made in China) President Bush, on his China trek, spoke about America explaining to its people about our culture. Our president, and 'What's-his-name, Ding Dong,' the head of a failed socialistic country that is now trying to create a Fascist socioeconomic regime such as ours. Behind closed doors, they came to an understanding on issues. This we are not too clear about, except that they agreed to disagree on religious and socialistic cultural ideals. 'Ding Dong,' does not like a middle man to siphon off church money, hence his state run churches. For churches to be associated with any foreign or structured authority within the country, is clearly out of the control of the state, and as such prone to raise public opinion to separate church and state, resulting in no money for the state - a Ding Dong with no bell. No money for the state, then no church, it is that simple and anything that smacks of individualism, is out of the question for the China leader. In a totalitarian regime it is control, control, control. Control of the citizen's mind, control of his physical being, and all that to control his wealth, its about money. That is how this world works. It is where the citizen is expected to bend to their will, and not speak out. Nor are they able to identify the state's motivation, and they are lazy or afraid to take any action - sounds like us. Bush spoke about our culture, how good we are and how we love everyone, even Chinese people when they are so different from us. That's OK, but that was treating them like children, what he should be telling them is how a free country's economy works. How we have property rights (which we all have but lost), and the responsibilities of a free people (that the state is assuming). Also, we cannot say these things because we would have to tell them that they are working because we buy from china whose cheap labor is costing us jobs in our country. Our president would have to tell them that we are propping up their failed communistic socialistic immoral system. Then it may become evident that socialism, Fascism, and theocracies cannot sustain an economy because they are morally bankrupt. If their system is so good why can't they bury us economically? They need our investments, which can only come from profits from a capitalistic society, which in this case, is taking jobs from United States citizens! Our greatest mistake is to allow the greatest loss of jobs in history to China. We should not be saving their corrupt immoral government, to create an even greater poor class in our own country, for Chinese people who will not even fight for their own freedom. They didn't come out in force against their government but let their children die in Tienamen Square and hid, with not even a whimper. They thank their government when one of their jailed children is let out of prison. We are prolonging their slavery for some undefined future. If you don't buy from China you will be doing those children a favor. Once Ding Dong and his cohorts have all the business in place they plan for, they will find reason to seize and nationalize their economy. We are buying time for them to arm themselves. Your moral action is to protest and look under that cheap item and don't buy anything that is (Made in China). Do you know what moral principle you will be following with that mental act? And, remember also, that freedom does not come cheap, but costs nothing to lose. Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEBSITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization" OR, "nicola, at: www.philo-psy.org" IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE.
	7. PHILO-PSY'S COMMENT OF THE WEEK 03-11-02 --- 03-17-02 ISOLATION FROM BIGOTRY Syria and the Saudi's have agreed to end Middle East violence in return for all land it won in the 1967 war. The Arab League is critical of their agreement since that body requires a consensus. The Palestinian's Hamas only wants the destruction of the Jewish state. Only Syria would be happy to get back their most treasured vantage point, the Golan Heights, to make them stronger in another religious/socialist conflict against Israel. Egypt's Leader Mubarak is pushing Bush to force both parties Sharon and Arafat to sit down and negotiate a peace, which he would host in Egypt. He seems to want to be the power broker, and if he wants to, let him. The Egyptian, Palestinian, and the Israeli can take care of themselves over there. It is our cue to exit this religious bigotry, and get out of the Middle East and only attack those who threaten to terrorize the U.S.A.. We supported leaders like Savimbi in Angola, and we should stay out of Africa. We supported NATO in the Balkans and we should get out of there (NATO & Balkans), and let them fight their own wars. And while we are at it get out of China, for a safer cold war, then we can drown the United Nations in the East River. The rest of the world has gone crazy, so let's not do the same. Let us enjoy our home as we all do, in isolation, which is the proper terminology for a country created for natural individualism. Of course we will have to keep a big gun in the house, as long as we have religious fanatics running around who may start WWIII. And when they do we should just bomb them from here, to stay home and take care of ourselves. Nicola PHILO-PSY'S PRESS RELEASE OR COMMENTS: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED, BUT MAY BE REPRINTED BY ANY NEWS SERVICE, OR SYNDICATE, OR WEBSITE PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING, "Nicola, The Philo-Psy Organization" OR, "nicola, at: www.philo-psy.org" IS USED AS A CREDIT LINE.
	8. China's Strategy Revisited (2005) Do Not Buy, "MADE IN CHINA" If you are following our home page comments, one of our past articles was titled, "Do Not Buy 'Made In China.' You may request a copy, give us 48 hours to e-mail it to you and it is to be for your use only. Well, as predicted in the essay, with our investing in their slave economy and buying from China would only strengthen their hold on their people, build up their war machine, threaten their neighbors, and in the near future, nationalize our investments. Since the beginning of our trade with China in the 1970s as a result of Nixon's permitting United States' capital and jobs to flow into a failed totalitarian socialist country that has built up their military, nuclear and missile war machine. Trade has not made them a peace loving regime but an embolden enemy of freedom. China, as a socialist state, was failing to create a socialist utopia, broke, living in abject poverty and was no threat. China welcomed Nixon's diplomatic move to suggest that a Fascist state would benefit their government while still maintaining dictatorial control. Their actions and ours since that time prove that strategy is working. They would use capitalism under oppressive state control and maintain control of their cultural dictatorship as well. United States diplomacy took a fatal direction a free country should know better not to take, and our economy is suffering for it today with the threat of capital loss and experiencing enormous job losses. Add 11,000,000 illeagal Mexican workers and the dilution of our China strained labor pool is dealing us an economic blow. How can anyone say to the poor, "You should get a job!" The Taiwan island nation is organizing for a referendum by Taiwan president, Chen Shi-bian, for March 20, 2004, for their 23 million people to gain their independence. They have worked hard and smart since the late 1940s to create a great capitalist economy, in freedom. The Taiwanese have a moral right to declare themselves free, as a people not unlike our own struggle for freedom. China's claim that Taiwan belongs to them is not true in moral justice. China will not be appeased, if we give them Taiwan and we the immoral nation we have become, will. Some of our own states have had referendums to secede without any interference from our national government. China's government in principle morally does not own land or the people within. All people have the right of choice, and the first is in who will govern them. Taiwan's referendum is their declaration and right of independence that especially we, should honor and do all we can to defend their wishes. "China's Zhang Mingqing, deputy director and spokesman for China's Taiwan Affairs Office, dramatized the relentless opposition to the referendum being organized....It was the latest in a crescendo of warnings that the referendum could provoke a strong Chinese reaction, with a military response the unspoken but clearly understood danger." If we watch the actions of China and our government what we predicted may become a frightening reality. Should the United States want to temporarily protect their investments, they may take actions behind diplomatic doors to convince Taiwan's leaders to put off their referendum. If we do that, instead of strongly telling China to leave the people of Taiwan to govern themselves, then we will be protecting China's long range goals to become a world threat. You know China's goals for world socialist domination, if you are a realist. We have no moral strategy for freedom. Nixon's and Kissinger's poor strategy has not worked in over thirty years with nothing but a grand failure in diplomacy and it is wrecking our culture and economy. Before you buy anything, turn it over to see where it is made. If it is "Made in China," do not buy it and save someone's job. Nicola (2005) COPYRIGHT© 2007 'Philo-Psy' (1148 N. Goodman Street, Rochester, NY 14609) (585) 338-1532. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.